Warnow, T. , Evans, S. N. , Ringe, D. , and Nakhleh, L. (2006) A Stochastic model of language evolution that incorporates homoplasy and borrowing. In Phylogenetic Methods and the Prehistory of Languages , pages 75--.

Warnow, T., Evans, S. N., Ringe, D., and Nakhleh, L. (2006) A Stochastic model of language evolution that incorporates homoplasy and borrowing. In Phylogenetic Methods and the Prehistory of Languages, pages 75--.

References (may not be complete) [Original format] [Sort by year] [Sort by author] [Sort by citations]

Bodlaender, H., Fellows, M., & Warnow, T. 1992. Two strikes against perfect phylogeny. Pages 273--283 of: Proceedings of the 19th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer Verlag.	Google
Buneman, P. 1971. The recovery of trees from measures of dissimilarity. Mathematics in the Archaelogical and Historical Sciences, 387--395.	Google
Garde, Paul. 1961. R’eflexions sur les di#’erences phon’etiques entre les langues slaves. Word 17, 34--62.	Google
Gusfield, D. 1990. E#cient algorithms for inferring evolutionary trees. Networks, 21, 19--28.	Google
Hoenigswald, H.M. 1960. Language Change and Linguistic Reconstruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.	Google
Kim, Junhyong, &Warnow, Tandy. 1999. Tutorial on Phylogenetic Tree Estimation. Presented at ISMB (Intelligent Systems for Molecular	Google
Biology) 1999, Heidelberg, Germany. Available electronically at http://kim.bio.upenn.edu/~jkim/media/ISMBtutorial.pdf.	Google
McMahon, April, & McMahon, Robert. 2003. Finding families: quantitative methods in language classification. Transactions of the Philological Society, 101, 7--55.	Google
Meillet, Antoine. 1925. La m’ethode comparative en linguistique historique. Oslo: Aschehoug.	Google
Mossel, Elchanan, & Steel, Michael. 2004. A phase transition for a random cluster model on phylogenetic trees. Math. Biosci., 187(2), 189--203.	Google
Nakhleh, L. 2004. Phylogenetic Networks in Biology and Historical Linguistics. Ph.D. thesis, The University of Texas at Austin.	Google
Nakhleh, Luay, Ringe, Don, & Warnow, Tandy. 2004. Perfect Phylogenetic Networks: A New Methodology for Reconstructing the Evolutionary History of Natural Languages. Language. To appear.	Google	UIUC
Porzig, Walter. 1954. Die Gliederung des indogermanischen Sprachgebiets. Heidelberg: Winter.	Google
Ringe, D., Warnow, T., & Taylor, A. 2002. Indo-European and computational cladistics. Transactions of the Philological Society, 100(1), 59--129.	Google	UIUC
Saitou, N., & Nei, M. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol., 4, 406--425.	Google
Steel, Michael. 1992. The complexity of reconstructing trees from qualitative characters and subtrees. Journal of Classification, 9, 91-116.	Google
Taylor, A., Warnow, T., & Ringe, D. 2000. Character-based reconstruction of a linguistic cladogram. Pages 393--408 of: Smith, J.C., &	Google
Bentley, D. (eds), Historical Linguistics 1995, Volume I: General issues and non-Germanic languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins.	Google
Tuffey, C., & Steel, M. 1997. Links between maximum likelihood and maximum parsimony under a simple model of site substitution. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 59(3), 581--607.	Google
Warnow, T. 1997. Mathematical approaches to comparative linguistics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 94, 6585--6590.	Google	UIUC
Waterman, M.S., Smith, T.F., Singh, M., & Beyer, W.A. 1977. Additive evolutionary trees. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 64, 199-213.	Google


HOME :: Back to the Paper :: References	Comments to: junwang4 you-know-at gmail.com	Last update: 2/3/09