Andersson, M., 1986. Evolution of condition-dependent sex ornaments and mating preferences: sexual selection based on viability differences. Evolution 40 (4), 804-816. | ||
Aoki, K., 1989. A sexual selection model for the evolution of imitative learning of song in polygynous birds. Am. Nat. 134 (4), 599-612. | ||
Ballentine, B., Hyman, J., Nowicki, S., 2004. Vocal performance influences female response to male bird song: an experimental test. Behav. Ecol. 14 (1), 163-168. | ||
Brighton, H., Kirby, S., Smith, K., 2005. Cultural selection for learnability: three principles underlying the view that language adapts to be learnable. In: Tallerman, M. (Ed.), Language Origins: Perspectives on Evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford (Chapter 13). | UIUC | |
Buchanan, K.L., Spencer, K.A., Goldsmith, A.R., Catchpole, C.K., 2003. Song as an honest signal of past developmental stress in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris). Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 270, 1149-1156. | ||
Buchanan, K., Leitner, S., Spencer, K., Goldsmith, A., Catchpole, C., 2004. Developmental stress selectively affects the song control nucleus HVC in the zebra finch. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 271 (1555), 2381-2386. | ||
Catchpole, C.K., Slater, P.J.B., 1995. Bird Song: Biological Themes and Variations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. | ||
Darwin, C., 1879. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex, second ed. John Murray, London (Reprinted in 2004 by Penguin). | ||
Draganoiu, T.I., Nagle, L., Kreutzer, M., 2002. Directional female preference for an exaggerated male trait in canary (Serinus canaria) song. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 269, 2525-2531. | ||
Grafen, A., 1990. Biological signals as handicaps. J. Theor. Biol. 144, 517-546. | ||
Hasselquist, D., 1998. Polygyny in great reed warblers: a long-term study of factors contributing to male fitness. Ecology 79 (7), 2376-2390. | ||
Heywood, J.S., 1989. Sexual selection by the handicap mechanism. Evolution 43 (7), 1387-1397. | ||
Kirkpatrick, M., 1982. Sexual selection and the evolution of female choice. Evolution 36 (1), 1-12. | ||
Lachlan, R.F., Feldman, M.W., 2003. Evolution of cultural communication systems: the coevolution of cultural signals and genes encoding learning preferences. J. Evol. Biol. 16, 1084-1095. | UIUC | |
Lachlan, R.F., Slater, P.J.B., 1999. The maintenance of vocal learning by gene-culture interaction: the cultural trap hypothesis. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 266, 701-706. | ||
Laland, K., 1994. Sexual selection with a culturally transmitted mating preference. Theor. Popul. Biol. 45, 1-15. | ||
Lauay, C., Gerlach, N.M., Adkins-Regan, E., Devoogd, T.J., 2004. Female zebra finches require early song exposure to prefer high-quality song as adults. Anim. Behav. 68, 1249-1255. | ||
Marler, P., Slabbekoorn, H. (Eds.), 2004. Nature's Music: The Science of Birdsong. Academic Press Inc., Ltd., London. | ||
Naguib, M., Nemitz, A., Gil, D., 2006. Maternal developmental stress reduces reproductive success of female offspring in zebra finches. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B (Published online). | ||
Nowicki, S., Searcy, W.A., 2004. Song function and the evolution of female preferences: why birds sing, why brains matter. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1016 (1), 704-723. | ||
Nowicki, S., Peters, S., Podos, J., 1998. Song learning, early nutrition and sexual selection in songbirds. Am. Zool. 38, 179-190. | ||
Nowicki, S., Hasselquist, D., Bensch, S., Peters, S., 2000. Nestling growth and song repertoire size in great reed warblers: evidence for song learning as an indicator mechanism in mate choice. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 267, 2419-2424. | ||
Nowicki, S., Searcy, W.A., Peters, S., 2002a. Brain development, song learning and mate choice in birds: a review and experimental test of the ``nutritional stress hypothesis''. J. Comp. Physiol. A Sens. Neural Behav. Physiol. 188 (11-12), 1003-1014. | ||
Nowicki, S., Searcy, W.A., Peters, S., 2002b. Quality of song learning affects female response to male bird song. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 269, 1949-1954. | ||
O'Connor, R.J., 1984. The Growth and Development of Birds. Wiley, New York. | ||
O'Donald, P., 1980. Genetic Models of Sexual Selection. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. | ||
Otto, S., Day, T., 2006. A Biologist's Guide to Mathematical Modeling in Ecology and Evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. | ||
Oudeyer, P.-Y., 2005. How phonological structures can be culturally selected for learnability. Adaptive Behav. 13, 269-280. | UIUC | |
Riebel, K., 2003. The ``mute'' sex revisited: vocal production and perception learning in female songbirds. Adv. Study Behav. 33, 49-86. | ||
Slater, P.J.B., 2003. Fifty years of bird song research: a case study in animal behaviour. Anim. Behav. 65, 633-639. | ||
Spencer, K.A., Buchanan, K.L., Goldsmith, A.R., Catchpole, C.K., 2004. Developmental stress, social rank and song complexity in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris). Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 271, (Suppl.) S121-S123. | ||
Spencer, K.A., Wimpenny, J.H., Buchanan, K.L., Lovell, P.G., Goldsmith, A.R., Catchpole, C.K., 2005. Developmental stress affects the attractiveness of male song and female choice in the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiology 58, 423-428. |
| HOME :: Back to the Paper :: References | Comments to: junwang4 you-know-at gmail.com | Last update: 2/3/09 |