HOME   ::   Back to the Paper   ::   References

O'Donnell, T. J., Hauser, M. D., and Fitch, W. T. (2005) Using mathematical models of language experimentally. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(6):284--289.

References (may not be complete)  [Original format]  [Sort by year]  [Sort by author]  [Sort by citations]

1 Chomsky, N. (1957) Syntactic Structures, Mouton

Google

2 Chomsky, N. (1965) Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, MIT Press

Google

3 Christiansen,M. and Kirby, S., eds (2003) Language Evolution, Oxford University Press

Google UIUC

4 Hauser, M. et al. (2002) The Language faculty: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298, 1569--1579

Google UIUC

5 Adger, D. (2003) Core Syntax: A Minimalist Approach, Oxford University Press

Google

6 Bresnan, J. (2001) Lexical-Functional Syntax, Blackwell

Google

7 Haegeman, L. (1991) Introduction to Government and Binding Theory, Blackwell

Google

8 Sag, I. et al. (2003) Syntactic Theory: a Formal Introduction, CSLI

Google

9 Legendre, G. et al., eds (2001) Optimality-Theoretic Syntax, The MIT Press

Google

10 Joshi, A. et al. (1991) The Convergence of Mildly Context-Sensitive Formalisms. In Processing of Linguistic Structure (Sells, P. et al., eds), pp. 31--81, MIT Press

Google

11 Partee, B.H. et al. (1990) Mathematical Methods in Linguistics, Kluwer Academic Publishers

Google

12 Mel-’c-¡uk, I.A. (1988) Dependency Syntax: Theory and Practice, State University of New York Press

Google

13 Abeille, A. and Rambow, O., eds (2000) Tree Adjoining Grammars: Formalisms, Linguistic Applications, and Processing, CSLI

Google

14 Batlin, M. and Collins, C., eds (2000) The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, Blackwell

Google

15 Jackendoff, R. (2002) Foundations of Language, Oxford University Press

Google UIUC

16 Moortgat, M. (1997) Categorial type logics. In Handbook of Logic and Language (Bentham, J.V. and Meulen, A.T., eds), MIT Press

Google

17 Steedman, M. (2001) The Syntactic Process, The MIT Press

Google

18 Comrie, B. (1981) Language Universals and Linguistic Typology: Syntax and Morphology, Blackwell

Google

19 Croft, W. (2002) Typology and Universals, Cambridge University Press

Google

20 Christiansen, M.H. and Kirby, S. (2003) Language evolution: consensus and controversies. Trends Cogn. Sci. 7, 300--307

Google UIUC

21 Hauser, M.D. (1997) The Evolution of Communication, MIT Press

Google UIUC

22 Hockett, C.F. (1960) Logical considerations in the study of animal communication. In Animal Sounds and Communication (Lanyon, W.E. and Tavolga, W.N., eds), pp. 392--430, American Institute of Biological Sciences

Google

23 Plotkin, J.B. and Nowak, M.A. (2001) Major transitions in language evolution. Entropy 3, 227--246

Google UIUC

24 Miller, P.H. (2000) Strong Generative Capacity: The Semantics of Linguistic Formalism, CSLI

Google

25 Bloomfield, L. (1933) Language, University of Chicago Press

Google

26 Chomsky, N. (1956) Three models for the description of language. IRE Trans. Inf. Theory 3, 113--124

Google

27 Hopcroft, J.E. et al. (2001) Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages, and Computation, Addison Wesley

Google

28 Fitch, W.T. and Hauser, M.D. (2004) Computational constraints on syntactic processing in a nonhuman primate. Science 303, 377--380

Google

29 Barton, G. et al. (1987) Computational Complexity and Natural Language, MIT Press

Google

30 Conway, C.M. and Christiansen,M. (2001) Sequential learning in nonhuman primates. Trends Cogn. Sci. 5, 539--546

Google UIUC

31 Steedman, M. (2000) The Syntactic Process, MIT Press

Google

32 Chomsky, N. (1959) On certain formal properties of grammars. Information and Control 2, 137--167

Google

33 Lambek, J. (1958) The mathematics of sentence structure. Am. Math. Monogr. 65, 154--169

Google

34 Rogers, J. (2001) A Descriptive Approach to Language-Theoretic Complexity, CSLI

Google

35 Shieber, S.M. (1992) Constraint-Based Grammar Formalisms: Parsing and Type Inference for Natural Language and Computer Languages, MIT Press

Google

36 Ristad, E.S. (1993) The Language Complexity Game, MIT Press

Google UIUC

37 Manning, C.D. and Schu-¨ tze, H. (1999) Foundations of Statisitical Natural Language Processing, MIT Press

Google

38 Pereira, F. (2000) Formal grammar and information theory: together again? Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. 358, 1239--1253

Google

39 Keenan, E. and Stabler, E. (2004) Bare Grammar: Lectures on Linguistic Invariants, University of Chicago Press

Google

40 Christiansen, M. and Curtin, S. (1999) Transfer of learning: rule acquisition or statistical learning. Trends Cogn. Sci. 3, 289--290

Google

41 Gomez, R.L. and Gerken, L. (2000) Infant artificial language learning and language acquisition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4, 178--186

Google

42 Onnis, L. et al. (2003) Reduction of uncertainty in human sequential learning: evidence from artificial language learning. In 25th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Scociety, pp. 886--891, Erlbaum

Google

43 Reber, A.S. (1967) Implicit learning of artificial grammars. J Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 6, 855--863

Google

44 Saffran, J. (2003) Statistical language learning: mechanisms and constraints. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 12, 110--114

Google

45 Saffran, J. et al. (1996) Statistical learning by 8-month-old Infants. Science 274, 1926--1928

Google

46 Marcus, G.F. et al. (1999) Rule learning by seven-month-old infants. Science 283, 77--80

Google

 HOME   ::   Back to the Paper   ::   References Comments to: junwang4 you-know-at gmail.com Last update: 2/3/09