Adamson, H. D. (1988). Variation theory and second language acquisition. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

Aitchison, J. (1996). Small steps or large leaps? Undergeneralization and overgeneralization in creole acquisition. In H. Wekker (Ed.), Creole languages and language acquisition (pp. 9-31). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.

Andersen, R. W. (1989). The theoretical status of variation in interlanguage development. In S. Gass, C. Madden, D. Preston, & L. Selinker (Eds.), Variation in second language acquisition Volume 2: Psycholinguistic issues (pp. 46-64). Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.

Arends,J.(1993).Towardsagradualistmodelofcreolization.InF.Byrne&J.Holm(Eds.),Atlanticmeets Pacific: A global view of pidginization and creolization (pp. 371-380). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Bakker, P. (1995). Pidgins. In J. Arends, P. Muysken, & N. Smith (Eds.), Pidgins and Creoles: an introduction (pp. 25-39). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Becker, A., & Veenstra, T. (2003). The survival of inflectional morphology in French-related creoles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 283-306.

Bever, T. G. (1982). Regression in the service of development. In T. G. Bever (Ed.), Regression in mental development: Basic properties and mechanisms (pp. 153-88). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Bickerton, D. (1981). Roots of language. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma.

Bickerton, D. (1984). The language bioprogram hypothesis. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7, 173-221.

Bickerton, D. (1988). Creole languages and the bioprogram. In F. J. Newmeyer (Ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge survey, vol. 2: Linguistic theory: Extensions and implications (pp. 268-284). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Bickerton, D., & Givón, T. (1976). Pidginization and syntactic change: From SXV and VSX to SVX. In S. B. Steever, C. A. Walker, & S. Mufwene (Eds.), Papers from the parasession on diachronic syntax (pp. 9-39). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.

Birdsong, D. (1999). Introduction: Whys and why nots of the Critical Period Hypothesis for second language acquisition. In D. Birdsong (Ed.), Second language acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis (pp. 1-22). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Bogartz, R. S. (1965). Sequential dependencies in children's probability learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 265-370.

Braine, M. D. S., Brody, R. E., Brooks, P. J., Sudhalter, V., Ross, J. A., Catalano, L., et al. (1990). Exploring language acquisition in children with a miniature artificial language: Effects of item and pattern frequency, arbitrary subclasses, and correction. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 591-610.

Brooks, P. J., Braine, M. D. S., Catalano, L., Brody, R. E., & Sudhalter, V. (1993). Acquisition of gender-like noun subclasses in an artificial language: The contribution of phonological markers to learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 76-95.

Chambers, J. K., Trudgill, P., & Schilling-Estes, N. (Eds.). (2003). The handbook of language variation and change. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Chomsky, N. A. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Chomsky, N. A. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris.

Chomsky, N. A. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Coppola, M., & Newport, E. L. (2004). `Subjects' in home sign: Linguistic structure in adult gesture systems without linguistic input. Manuscript submitted for publication.

Craig, G. J., & Myers, J. L. (1963). A developmental study of sequential two-choice decision making. Child Development, 34, 483-493.

DeGraff, M. (1999a). Creolization, language change, and language acquisition: A prolegomenon. In M. DeGraff (Ed.), Language creation and language change: Creolization, diachrony, and development (pp. 1-46). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

DeGraff, M. (1999b). Creolization, language change, and language acquisition: An epilogue. In M. DeGraff (Ed.), Language creation and language change: Creolization, diachrony, and development (pp. 473-543). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

DeGraff, M. (Ed.). (1999c). Language creation and language change: Creolization, diachrony, and development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Ellis, R. (1989). Sources of intra-learner variability in language use and their relationship to second language acquisition. In S. Gass, C. Madden, D. Preston, & L. Selinker (Eds.), Variation in second languageacquisitionVolume2:Psycholinguisticissues(pp.22-45).Philadelphia:MultilingualMatters.

Estes, W. K. (1964). Probability learning. In A. W. Melton (Ed.), Categories of human learning (pp. 89-128). New York: Academic.

Estes, W. K. (1976). The cognitive side of probability learning. Psychological Review, 83, 37-64.

Gardner, R. A. (1957). Probability-learning with two and three choices. American Journal of Psychology, 70, 174-185.

Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). The resilience of language. New York: Psychology Press.

Goldin-Meadow, S., & Mylander, C. (1984). Gestural communication in deaf children: The effects and noneffects of parental input on early language development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 49(3-4, Serial No. 207).

Goldowsky, B. (1995). Learning structured systems from imperfect information (Doctoral dissertation, University of Rochester, 1995). Dissertation Abstracts International, 56-05B, 2910.

Greenberg, J. H. (1963). Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In J. H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of language (pp. 73-113). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Hall, R. A., Jr. (1966). Pidgin and creole languages. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Hudson, C. L., & Eigsti, I.-M. (2003). The Lexical Competence Hypothesis: A cognitive account of the relationship between vernacularization and grammatical expansion in creolization. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 18, 1-79.

Hudson Kam, C. L., & Newport, E. L. (2005). Getting it right by getting it wrong: When do learners change languages? Manuscript submitted for publication.

Ingram, D., & Pye, C. (1993). The acquisition of miniature languages: The search for a new paradigm. International Journal of Psycholinguistics, 9, 147-158.

Johnson, J., & Newport E. L. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 60-99.

Johnson, J., Shenkman, K., Newport, E. L., & Medin, D. (1996). Indeterminacy in the grammar of adult language learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 335-352.

Johnston, J., Blatchley, M., & Olness, G. S. (1990). Miniature language system acquisition by children with different learning proficiencies. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 33, 335-342.

Kegl, J., & Iwata, G. (1989). Lenguaje de Signos Nicaragüense: A pidgin sheds light on the "creole?" ASL. In R. Carlson, S. DeLancey, S. Gildea, D. Payne, & A. Saxena (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Pacific Linguistics Conference (pp. 266-294). Eugene: University of Oregon.

Kiparsky, P. (1971). Historical linguistics. In W. O. Dingwall (Ed.), A survey of linguistic science (pp. 576-642). College Park: University of Maryland Press.

Klein, W., & Perdue, C. (1993). Utterance structure. In C. Perdue (Ed.), Adult language acquisition: Cross-linguistic perspectives. Volume 2. The results (pp. 3-40). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Kroch, A. (1989). Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change, 1, 199-244.

Labov, W. (1969). Contraction, deletion, and inherent variability of the English copula. Language, 45, 715-762.

Labov, W. (1990). On the adequacy of natural languages: I. The development of tense. In J. V. Singler (Ed.), Pidgin and creole tense-mood-aspect systems (pp. 1-58). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Labov, W. (1994). Principles of linguistic change. Vol 1: Internal factors. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

Lefebvre, C. (1996). The tense, mood, and aspect system of Haitian Creole and the problem of transmission of grammar in creole genesis. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 11, 231-311.

Lefebvre, C. (1998). Creole genesis and the acquisition of grammar: The case of Haitian Creole. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Lefebvre, C., & Lumsden, J. S. (1989). Les langues creoles et la theorie linguistique. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 34, 249-272.

Lenneberg, E. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.

Lumsden, J. S. (1999). Language acquisition and creolization. In M. Degraff (Ed.), Creolization, diachrony, and language acquisition (pp. 129-157). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

McWhorter, J. H. (1997). Towards a new model of creole genesis. New York: Peter Lang.

Meisel, J. M., Clahsen, H., & Pienemann, M. (1981). On determining developmental stages in natural second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 3, 109-135.

Mintz, T. H., Newport, E. L., & Bever, T. G. (2002). The distributional structure of grammatical categories in speech to young children. Cognitive Science, 26, 393-425.

Moeser, S. D., & Olson, A. J. (1974). The role of reference in children's acquisition of a miniature artificial language. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 17, 204-218.

Mufwene, S. (1996). The founder principle in creole genesis. Diachronica, 13, 83-134.

Mühlhäusler, P. (1986). Pidgin and creole linguistics. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.

Newport, E. L. (1984). Constraints on learning: Studies in the acquisition of American Sign Language. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, 23, 1-22.

Newport, E. L. (1990). Maturational constraints on language learning. Cognitive Science, 14, 11-28.

Newport, E. L. (1999). Reduced input in the acquisition of signed languages: Contributions to the study of creolization. In M. Degraff (Ed.), Creolization, diachrony, and language acquisition (pp. 161-78). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Newport, E. L., & Aslin, R. N. (2000). Innately constrained learning: Blending old and new approaches to language acquisition. In S. C. Howell, S. A. Fish, & T. Keith-Lucas (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.

Newport, E. L., & Aslin, R. N. (2004). Learning at a distance: I. Statistical learning of non-adjacent dependencies. Cognitive Psychology, 48, 127-162.

Perdue, C. (Ed.). (1993). Adult language acquisition: Cross-linguistic perspectives. Volume 2. The results. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Roberts, S. J. (1998). The role of diffusion in the genesis of Hawaiian Creole. Language, 74,1-39.

Romaine, S. (1988). Pidgin and Creole languages. London: Longman.

Romaine, S. (1989). Pidgins, creoles, immigrant, and dying languages. In N. C. Dorian (Ed.), Investigating obsolescence: Studies in language contraction and death (pp. 369-383). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Ross, D. S. (2001). Disentangling the nature-nurture interaction in the language acquisition process: Evidence from deaf children of hearing parents exposed to non-native input (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Rochester, 2001). Dissertation Abstracts International, 62-07B, 3402.

Ross, D. S., & Newport, E. L. (1996). The development of language from non-native linguistic input. In A. Stringfellow, D. Cahana-Amitay, E. Hughs, & A. Zukowski (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 623-645). Boston: Cascadilla.

Ross, D. S., & Newport, E. L. (2005). The effects of inconsistency and error in non-native input on the acquisition of American Sign Language verbs of motion. Unpublished manuscript.

Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month old infants. Science, 274, 1926-1928.

Saffran, J. R., Newport, E. L., & Aslin, R. N. (1996). Word segmentation: The role of distributional cues. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 606-621

Sankoff, G. (1994). An historical and evolutionary approach to variation in the Tok Pisin verb phrase. In K. Beals, J. Denton, R. Knippen, L. Melnar, H. Suzuki, & E. Zeinfeld (Eds.), CLS 30--Papers from the 30th regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 1994, Volume 2: The parasession on variation in linguistic theory (pp. 293-320). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.

Sankoff,G.,&Laberge,S.(1973).Ontheacquisitionofnativespeakersbyalanguage.Kivung,6,32-47.

Schumann, J. H. (1978). The pidginization process: A model for second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Sebba, M. (1997). Contact languages: Pidgins and creoles. New York: St. Martin's Press.

Senghas, A. (1995). The development of Nicaraguan Sign Language via the language acquisition process. In D. MacLaughlin & S. McEwen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 543-552). Boston: Cascadilla.

Senghas, A. (2000). The development of early spatial morphology in Nicaraguan Sign Language. In S. C. Howell, S. A. Fish, & T. Keith-Lucas (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 696-707). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.

Senghas, A., & Coppola, M. (2001). The creation of Nicaraguan Sign Language by children: Language genesis as language acquisition. Psychological Science, 12, 323-328.

Senghas, A., Coppola, M., Newport, E. L., & Supalla, T. (1997). Argument structure in Nicaraguan Sign Language: The emergence of grammatical devices. In E. Hughes, M. Hughs, & A. Greenhill (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 550-561). Boston: Cascadilla.

Singler, J. V. (1995). The demographics of creole genesis in the Caribbean: A comparison of Martinique and Haiti. In J. Arends (Ed.), The Early stages of creolization (pp. 203-232). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Singleton, J. L. (1989). Restructuring of language from impoverished input: Evidence for linguistic compensation (Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1989). Dissertation Abstracts International, 50-11B, 5349.

Singleton, J. L., & Newport, E. L. (2004). When learners surpass their models: The acquisition of American Sign Language from impoverished input. Cognitive Psychology, 49, 370-407.

Slobin, D. (1977). Language change in childhood and history. In J. Macnamara (Ed.), Language learning and thought (pp. 185-214). New York: Academic.

Sorace, A. (1999). Initial states, end-states, and residual optionality in L2 acquisition. In A. Greenhill, H. Littlefield, & C. Tano (Eds.), Proceedings of the Boston University Conference on Language Development, 23, Vol. 2 (pp. 666-674). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.

Sorace, A. (2000). Syntactic optionality in non-native grammars. Second Language Research, 16, 93-102.

Stevenson, H. W., & Weir, M. W. (1959). Variables affecting childrens' performance in a probability learning task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 403-412.

Stevenson, H. W., & Zigler, E. F. (1958). Probability learning in children. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 185-192.

Thomason, S. G. (1997). A typology of contact languages. In A. K. Spears & D. Winford (Eds.), The structure and status of pidgins and creoles (pp. 71-88). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Thomason, S. G. (2003). What motivates changes that occur in emerging pidgins and creoles? Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 18, 107-120.

Thomason, S. G., & Kaufman, T. (1988). Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Thompson, S. P., & Newport, E. L. (2004) Statistical learning of syntax: The role of transitional probability. Paper submitted for publication.

Traugott, E. C. (1973). Le changement linguistique et sa relation à l'acquisition de la langue maternelle. Langages, 32, 39-53.

Traugott, E. C. (1977). Pidginization, creolization, and language change. In A. Valdman (Ed.), Pidgin and creole linguistics (pp. 70-98). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Weir, M. W. (1964). Developmental changes in problem-solving strategies. Psychological Review, 71, 473-490.

Wolfram, W. (1985). Variability in tense marking: A case for the obvious. Language Learning, 35, 229-253.