Hinzen, W. (2006) Minimalist foundations of language evolution: on the question of why language is the way it is. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on the Evolution of Language , pages 115--122.

Hinzen, W. (2006) Minimalist foundations of language evolution: on the question of why language is the way it is. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on the Evolution of Language, pages 115--122.

Carstairs-McCarthy, A. (1999). The Origins of Complex Language, Oxford: OUP.	Google	UIUC
Culicover, P. & R. Jackendoff (2005). Simpler syntax, Oxford: OUP.	Google
Chomsky (2005), `On Phases', Ms.	Google
Collins, C. (2002). Eliminating Labels. In S. Epstein and D. Seely (Eds.), Derivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program, 42-64. Oxford: Blackwell.	Google
Hauser, M., Chomsky, N., & W. T. Fitch (2002). The Faculty of Language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298, 1569-1579.	Google	UIUC
Hinzen (2006). Mind design and minimal syntax. Oxford: OUP.	Google
Hinzen, W., J. Uriagereka (to appear). On the metaphysics of linguistics, Ms.	Google
Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of Language. Oxford: OUP.	Google	UIUC
Müller, G. B. (1990). `Developmental mechanisms at the origin of morphological novelty: A side-effect hypothesis'. In M.H. Nitecki (Ed.), Evolutionary Innovations 99-130. Chicago.	Google
Pinker, S., and R. Jackendoff (in press). `What's special about the human language faculty?', Cognition.	Google
Terrace, H. (2005). Metacognition and the evolution of language. In Terrace&Metcalfe (Eds.), The missing link in cognition, 84-115. Oxford University Press.	Google
Walsh, D.M., T. Lewens, and A. Ariew (2002). The Trials of Life: Natural Selection and Random Drift. Philosophy of Science 69, 452-473.	Google


HOME :: Back to the Paper :: References	Comments to: junwang4 you-know-at gmail.com	Last update: 2/3/09