Baayen, R. H. 2001 Word frequency distributions. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. | ||
Bolloba´s, B. 1998 Modern graph theory. New York: Springer. | ||
Chomsky, N. 1965 Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. | ||
Damper, R. I. & Harnad, S. R. 2000 Neural network modeling of categorical perception. Percept. Psychophys. 62, 843-867. | ||
Deacon, T. W. 1997 The symbolic species: the co-evolution of languageandthebrain.NewYork:W.W.Norton&Company. | UIUC | |
Donald, M. 1991 Origins of the modern mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. | ||
Donald, M. 1998 Mimesis and the executive suit: missing links in language evolution. In Approaches to the evolution of language: social and cognitive bases (ed. J. R. Hurford, M. Studdert-Kennedy & C. Knight), pp. 44-67. Cambridge University Press. | UIUC | |
Ferrer i Cancho, R. 2005 Decoding least effort and scaling in signal frequency distributions. Physica A. 345, 275-284. | UIUC | |
Ferrer i Cancho, R. & Sole´, R. V. 2003 Least effort and the origins of scaling in human language. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 788-791. | UIUC | |
Ferrer i Cancho, R., Sole´, R. V. & Ko¨hler, R. 2003 Patterns in syntactic dependency networks. Phys. Rev. E 69, 051915-1-051915-8. | UIUC | |
Givo´n, T. 2002 Bio-linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. | ||
Harnad, S. 2003 Categorical perception Encyclopedia of cognitive science. London: Nature Publishing Group/Macmillan. | ||
Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N. & Fitch, W. T. 2002 The faculty of language: what is it, who has it and how did it evolve? Science 298, 1569-1579. | UIUC | |
Helbig, G. 1992 Probleme der valenz und kasustheorie. Tu¨binguen: Niemeyer. | ||
Hockett, C. F. 1960 Logical considerations in the study of animal communication. In Animal sounds and communications (ed. W. Lanyon & W. Tavolga), pp. 392-430. Washington: American Institute of Biological Sciences.. | ||
Li, W. 1992 Random texts exhibit Zipf's-law-like word frequency distribution. IEEE T. Inform. Theory 38(6), 1842-1845. | ||
Lieberman, P. 1991 Uniquely human: the evolution of speech, thought and selfless behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. | UIUC | |
Mandelbrot, B. 1953 An informational theory of the statistical structure of language. In Communication theory (ed. W. Jackson), p. 486. London: Butterworths. | ||
Melcuk, I. 1989 Dependency grammar: theory and practice. University of New York Press. | ||
Miller, G. A. & Chomsky, N. 1963 Finitary models of language users. In Handbook of mathematical psychology (ed. R. D. Luce, R. Bush & E. Galanter), vol. 2. New York: Wiley. | ||
Nowak, M. A. 2000 Evolutionary biology of language. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 355, 1615-1622. | UIUC | |
Nowak, M. A. & Krakauer, D. C. 1999 The evolution of language. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 8028-8033. | UIUC | |
Nowak, M. A., Krakauer, D. C. & Dress, A. 1999 An error limit for the evolution of language. Proc. R. Soc. B 266, 2131-2136. | UIUC | |
Nowak,M.A.,Plotkin,J.B.&Jansen,V.A.2000Theevolution of syntactic communication. Nature 404, 495-498. | UIUC | |
Sleator, D. & Temperley, D. 1991 Parsing English with a link grammar (Tech. Rep.). Carnegie Mellon University. | ||
Zipf, G. K. 1972 Human behaviour and the principle of least effort. An introduction to human ecology. New York: Hafner (1st edition; Reprinted by Cambridge, MA: Addison- Wesley 1949). |
| HOME :: Back to the Paper :: References | Comments to: junwang4 you-know-at gmail.com | Last update: 2/3/09 |