Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 577-660.

Cangelosi (in press). Grounding symbols in perceptual and sensorimotor categories: Connectionist and embodied approaches. In H. Cohen & C. Lefebvre (Eds), Categorization in Cognitive Science, Elsevier

Cangelosi A., Greco A. & Harnad S. (2000). From robotic toil to symbolic theft: Grounding transfer from entry-level to higher-level categories. Connection Science, 12(2), 143-162.

Coventry, K. R. & Garrod, S. C. (2004). Saying, Seeing and Acting: The Psychological Semantics of Spatial Prepositions. Psychology Press, Hove.

Coventry K.R., Prat-Sala M., Richards L.V. (2001). The interplay between geometry and function in the comprehension of `over', `under', `above' and `below'. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 376-398.

Coventry K.R. et al. (in submission). Spatial language and perceptual symbol symbols: Implementing the functional geometric framework.

Edelman S. (1999). Representation and Recognition in Vision. MIT Press.

Glenberg A.M., Kaschak M. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9(3), 558-565.

Joyce D., Richards L., Cangelosi A., Coventry K.R. (2002), Object representation-byfragments in the visual system: A neurocomputational model. In L. Wang et al. (Eds), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Neural Information Processing (ICONP02) IEEE Press.

Joyce. D. W., Richards, L. V., Cangelosi, A. & Coventry, K. R. (2003). On the foundations of perceptual symbol systems: Specifying embodied representations via connectionism. In F. Dretje et al. (Eds.), The Logic of Cognitive Systems. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Cognitive Modelling, pp147- 152. Universitats-Verlag Bamberg, Germany.

Hormann H. (1983). Then calculating listener, or how many are einige, mehrere and ein paar (some, several and a few). In R. Bauerle, C. Schwarze, & A, von Stechow (Eds.), Meaning, use and interpretation of language. Berlin.

Landauer, T., & Dumais, S. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: the latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211-240.

Logan G.D., Sadler D.D. (1996). A computational analysis of the apprehension of spatial relations. In P. Bloom, M.A. Peterson, L. Nadel, M.F. Garrett (Eds.), Language and Space (pp. 493-530). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Massera G., Nolfi S., Cangelosi A. (in press), Evolving a simulated robotic arm able to grasp objects. In A. Cangelosi A., G. Bugmann & R. Borisyuk (Eds.), Modelling Language, Cognition and Action: Proceedings of the 9th Neural Computation and Psychology Workshop. Singapore: World Scientific

Newstead S.E., Coventry K.R. (2000). The role of context and functionality in the interpretation of quantifiers. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 12(2), 243- 259.

Plunkett, K., Sinha, C., Moller, M.F & Strandsry, O. (1992). Symbol grounding or the emergence of symbols? Vocabulary growth in children and a connectionist net. Connection Science, 4(3-4), 293-312.

Regier T. (1996). The human semantic potential: Spatial language and constrained connectionism. Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press.

Regier T., Carlson L.A. (2001) Grounding spatial language in perception: An empirical and computational investigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(2), 273-298.

Steels L. (2003). Evolving grounded communication for robots. Trends in Cognitive Science. 7(7), 308-312.