Allen, J. (1997a). Argument structures without lexical entries. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California.

Allen, J. (1997b). Probabilistic constraints in the acquisition of verb argument structures. In Proceedings of the third conference on generative approaches to language acquisition. Edinburgh.

Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1982). A functionalist approach to language development. In E. Wanner & L. Gleitman (Eds.), Language acquisition: The state of the art. Canbridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Berwick, R., & Weinberg, A. (1984). The grammatical basis of linguistic performance. MIT Press.

Bever, T. G. (1972). The limits of intuition. Foundations of Language, 8, 411-412.

Borer, H., & Wexler, K. (1992). Bi-unique relations and the maturation of grammatical principles. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 10(2).

Bresnan, J. (1978). A realistic transformational grammar. In M. Halle, J. Bresnan, & G. Miller (Eds.), Linguistic theory and psychological reality (p. 1-59). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Browman, C., & Goldstein, L. (1989). Aticulatory gestures as phonological units. Phonology, 6, 151-206.

Caramazza, A., & Zurif, E. (1976). Dissociation of algorithmic and heuristic processes in language comprehension. Brain and Language, 3, 572-582.

Chater, N., & Christiansen, M. H. (in press). Connectionism and natural language processing. In S. Garrod & M. Pickering (Eds.), Language processing. University College London Press.

Chomsky, N. (1961). Some methodological remarks on generative grammar. Word, 17, 219-239.

Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Foris: Dordrecht.

Chomsky, N. (1995). Categories and transformations. In The minimalist program (p. 219-234). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Clark, H. H., & Haviland, S. E. (1974). Psychological processes as linguistic explanation. In D. Cohen (Ed.), (p. 91-124). Washington D.C.: Hemisphere.

Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and paralleldistributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100(4), 589-608.

Druks, J., & Marshall, J. C. (1991). Agrammatism: An analysis and critique, with new evidence from four hebrew-speaking aphasic patients. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 8(6), 415-433.

Elman, J. L. (1990). Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science, 14, 179--211.

Fodor, J., Bever, T., & Garret, M. (1974). The psychology of language. New York: McGraw Hill.

Frazier, L., & Fodor, J. (1978). The sausage machine: A new two stage parsing model. Cognition, 6, 291-326.

Gold, E. M. (1967). Language identification in the limit. Information and Control, 10(16), 447-74.

Grimshaw, J., & Rosen, S. T. (1990). Knowledge and obedience: The developmental status of the binding theory. Linguistic Inquiry, 21(2), 187-222.

Grodzinsky, Y. (1990). Theoretical perspectives on language deficits. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

Grodzinsky, Y. (1995). Trace deletion, theta-roles, and cognitive strategies. Brain and language, 51(3), 469-497. SIMULATING GRAMMATICALITY JUDGMENTS 27

Hildebrandt, N., Caplan, D., & Evans, K. (1987). The man i left t i without a trace: A case study of aphasic processing of empty categories. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 4(3), 257-302.

Hummel, J., & Biederman, I. (1992). Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape-recognition. Psychological Review, 99(3), 480-517.

Kelly, M. H. (1992). Using sound to solve syntactic problems: The role of phonology in grammatical category assignments. Psychological Review, 99(2), 349-364.

Lakeoff, G. (1973). Fuzzy grammar and the performance competence terminology game. In C. Corum, C. T. Smith-Stark, & A. Weiser (Eds.), Papers from the ninth regional meeting. Chicago.

Linebarger, M. C. (1989). Neuropsychological evidence for linguistic modularity. In G. N. Carlson & M. K. tanenhaus (Eds.), Linguistic structure in language processing (p. 197-238). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.

Linebarger, M. C., Schwartz, M. F., & Saffran, E. M. (1983). Sensitivity to grammatical structure in so-called agrammatic aphasics. Cognition, 13, 361-392.

MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994). The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 101(4), 676-703.

Maddiesson, I. (1997). Phonetic universals. In W. Hardcastle & J. Laver (Eds.), The handbook of phonetic sciences. Blackwell.

Milekic, S., Boskovic, Z., Crain, S., & Shankweiler, D. (1995). Comprehension of nonlexical categories in agrammatism. Journal of psycholinguistic research, 24(4), 299-311.

Miller, G. (1990). Wordnet: An on-line lexical database. International Journal of Lexicography, 3(4).

Omlin, C. W., & Giles, C. L. (1995). Extraction of rules from discrete-time recurrent neural networks. Neural Networks, to appear.

Pearlmutter, B. A. (1989). Learning state space trajectories in recurrent neural networks. Neural Computation, 1, 263-269.

Plaut, D., McClelland, J., Seidenberg, M., & Patterson, K. (1995). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review.

Plaut, D. C. (1997). Structure and function in the lexical system: Insights from distributed models of word reading and lexical decision. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12.

Saffran, E., Schwartz, M., & Marin, O. S. M. (1980). The word order problem in agrammatism. Brain and Language, 10, 249-262.

Saffran, J., Aslin, R., & Newport, E. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month old infants. Science(5294), 1926-1928.

Schutze, C. T. (1996). The empirical base of linguistics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Seidenberg, M. (1997). Language acquisition and use learning and applying probabilistic constraints. Science, 275(5306), 1599-1603.

Seidenberg, M., Allen, J., & Christiansen, M. (1997). Probabilistic constraints in acquisition. In Proceedings of the third conference on generative approaches to language acquisition. Edinburgh.

Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96(4), 523-568. SIMULATING GRAMMATICALITY JUDGMENTS 28

Smolensky, P. (1986). Information processing in dynamical systems: Foundations of harmony theory. In J. McClelland & D. Rumelhart (Eds.), Parrallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. volume 2 psychological and biological models. (p. 194-281). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Stemberger, J. P. (1985). Bound morpheme loss errors in normal and agrammatic speech:one mechanism or two? Brain & Language, 25(2), 246-256.

Tesak, J., & Hummer, P. (1994). A note on prepositions in agrammatism. Brain & Language, 46(3), 463-468.

Trueswell, J., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Kello, C. (1993). Verb specific constraints in sentence processing: Separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 19(3), 528-553.

van Gelder, T. (in press). The dynamical hypothesis in cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

von der Malsburg, C., & Schneider, W. (1986). A neural cocktail party processor. Biological Cybernetics, 54, 29-40.

Wexler, K., & Cullicover, P. (1980). Formal principles of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Wexler, K., & Hamburger, H. (1973). On the sufficiency of surface data for the learning of transformational languages. In K. Hintikka, J. Moravcsik, & P. Suppes (Eds.), Approaches to natural languages. Boston: D. Reidel.

Williams, R., & Zipser, D. (1990). Gradient based learning algorithms for recurrent connectionist networks (Technical Report NU-CCS-90-9). College of Computer Science, Northeastern University.

Zurif, E., & Grodzinsky, Y. (1983). Sensitivity to grammatical structure in agrammatic aphasics: A reply to linebarger, schwartz and saffran. Cognition, 15, 207-213.