| Bookmark: |
Full-text
| URL: http://www.ling.ed.ac.uk/~s0459685/Scott...ng%20-%20Evolang.pdf |
| Cached: PDF-186K |
| SAVE AS an easy-to-recall long filename: |
| Filename format: author--year--title PDF-186K |
| Filename format: author--year--title--journal|proceedings|...--pages PDF-186K |
Related links
| Web search: Google Web Search :: Google Scholar |
| Within this site: References (31) |
Abstract
The defining problem of animal signalling theory is how reliable communication systems remain stable. The problem comes into sharp focus when signals take an arbitrary form, as human words do. Many researchers, particularly those in evolutionary linguistics, assume that the handicap principle is the only recognised solution to this paradox, and hence conclude that the process that underpins reliability in humans must be exceptional. However, there are other examples of cheap yet reliable signals in nature, and corresponding processes that may explain such examples. This paper reviews these alternatives and concludes that by far the most likely explanation of the stability of human communication is our ability to assess individual reputation: we hold the threat of social exclusion against those who signal unreliably and hence keep their utterances reliable.BibTex
@incollection{sphillips08evolang7th,
author={Thomas C. Scott-Phillips},
title={On the Correct Application of Animal Signalling Theory to Human Communication},
year={2008},
month={March},
pages={275-282},
editor={A. D. M. Smith and K. Smith and R. Ferrer-i-Cancho},
publisher={World Scientific},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on the Evolution of Language},
url={http://www.isrl.uiuc.edu/~amag/langev/paper/sphillips08evolang7th.html}
}
| HOME :: Edited Book List :: Book Chapter | Comments to: junwang4 you-know-at gmail.com | Last update: 10/27/09 |