| 2006 | - | The simpler syntax hypothesis. - Culicover,Jackendoff |
:: | |
| | 34 Newmeyer, F.J. (1998) On the supposed `counterfunctionality' of Universal Grammar: some evolutionary implications. In Approaches to the Evolution of Language (Hurford, J. et al., eds), pp. 305-319, Cambridge University Press
|
| 2002 | - | Did language evolve like the vertebrate eye? - Botha |
:: | |
| | Newmeyer, F.J., 1998. On the supposed `counterfactuality' of Universal Grammar: some evolutionary implications. In: Hurford, J., Studdert-Kennedy, M., Knight, C. (Eds.), Approaches to the Evolution of Language. Social and Cognitive Bases. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 305-319.
|
| 2001 | - | Sciences of complexity and language origins: an alternative to natural selection - Longa |
:: | |
| | --(1998). On the supposed `counterfunctionality' of Universal Grammar: some evolutionary implications. In Hurford, James, Michael Studdert-Kennedy and Chris Knight (eds.), Approaches to the Evolution of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 305--319.
|
| 2001 | - | From Cultural Selection to Genetic Selection: A Framework for the Evolution of Language - Dor,Jablonka |
:: | 1 |
| | NEWMEYER, F. J. (1998): On the supposed `counterfunctionality' of universal grammar: Some evolutionary implications. In HURFORD, J. R., STUDDERT-KENNEDY, M. and KNIGHT, C. (eds): Approaches to the Evolution of Language. Cambridge University Press.
|
| 1999 | - | Possible stages in the evolution of the language capacity - Jackendoff |
:: | 26 |
| | 3 Newmeyer, F.J. (1998) On the supposed `counterfunctionality' of Universal Grammar: some evolutionary implications, in Approaches to the Evolution of Language (Hurford, J., Studdert-Kennedy, M. and Knight, C., eds), pp. 305--319, Cambridge University Press
|