| 2008 | - | Analogy and Multi-Level Selection in the Formation of a Case Grammar. A Case Study in Fluid Construction Grammar - van Trijp |
:: | |
| | JACKENDOFF, R. & PINKER, S. (2005). The nature of the language faculty and its implications for the evolution of language (reply to Fitch, Hauser, & Chomsky). Cognition, 97, 211-225. 31
|
| 2008 | - | Long-Distance Dependencies are not Uniquely Human - Ferrer-i-Cancho,Longa,Lorenzo |
:: | |
| | Jackendoff, R. & Pinker, S. (2005). The nature of the language faculty and its implications for evolution of language (reply to Fitch, Hauser, and Chomsky). Cognition, 95, 211-225.
|
| 2007 | - | The evolution of language - Kirby |
:: | 1 |
| | Jackendoff, R. and Pinker, S. (2005). The nature of the language faculty and its implications for evolution of language (reply to Fitch, Hauser, and Chomsky). Cognition, 97(2):211-225.
|
| 2006 | - | Evolution as a Constraint on Theories of Syntax: The Case against Minimalism - Parker |
:: | 1 |
| | ----, & S. PINKER. 2005. The nature of the language faculty and its implications for evolution of language (Reply to Fitch, Hauser, and Chomsky). Cognition 97.211-25.
|
| 2006 | - | An Epistemological Inquiry into the 'What is Language' Question and the 'What Did Language Evolve For' Question - Gontier |
:: | |
| | Jackendoff, R., & Pinker, S. (2005). The nature of the language faculty and its implications for evolution of language (Reply to Fitch, Hauser, and Chomsky). Cognition, 97 (2), 211-225.
|