| xxxx | - | Universals and the diachronic life cycle of languages - Hurford |
:: | |
| | Hauser, M., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, T. (2002) The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298, 1569-1579.
|
| 2009 | - | Restrictions on biological adaptation in language evolution - Chater,Reali,Christiansen |
:: | |
| | 48. Hauser MD, Chomsky N, Fitch, WT (2002) The faculty of language: What is it, who has it and how did it evolve? Science 298: 1569-1579.
|
| 2008 | - | Removing 'Mind-Reading' from the Iterated Learning Model - Worgan,Damper |
:: | |
| | Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, W. T. (2002). The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298(22), 1569- 1579.
|
| 2008 | - | Analogy and Multi-Level Selection in the Formation of a Case Grammar. A Case Study in Fluid Construction Grammar - van Trijp |
:: | |
| | HAUSER, M.D., CHOMSKY, N. & FITCH, W.T. (2002). The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298, 1569-1579. 31
|
| 2008 | - | Cultural evolution: implications for understanding the human language faculty and its evolution - Smith,Kirby |
:: | 4 |
| | Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N. & Fitch, W. T. 2002 The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298, 1569-1579. (doi:10.1126/science.298.5598. 1569)
|
| 2008 | - | Is a holistic protolanguage a plausible precursor to language? A test case for a modern evolutionary linguistics - Smith |
:: | 1 |
| | Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, W. T. (2002). The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve. Science, 298, 1569-1579.
|
| 2008 | - | Primate social knowledge and the origins of language - Seyfarth,Cheney |
:: | |
| | Hauser MD, Chomsky N, Fitch W (2002) The faculty of language: what it is, who has it, and how did it evolve. Science 298:1565-1568
|
| 2008 | - | Grammatical pattern learning by human infants and cotton-top tamarins monkeys - Saffran,Hauser,Siebel,Kapfhamer,Tsao,Cushman |
:: | |
| | Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, W. T. (2002). The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298, 1569-1579.
|
| 2008 | - | Cost and complexity: Selection for speech and language - Locke |
:: | |
| | Hauser, M.D., Chomsky, N., Fitch, W.T., 2002. The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298, 1569-1579.
|
| 2008 | - | Language co-evolved with the rule of law - Knight |
:: | |
| | Hauser MD, Chomsky N, Fitch WT (2002) The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298:1569-1579
|
| 2008 | - | The evolution of human communication and language - Hurford |
:: | |
| | Hauser, M.D., Chomsky, N. and Fitch, W.T. (2002). The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298, 1569-1579.
|
| 2008 | - | Long-Distance Dependencies are not Uniquely Human - Ferrer-i-Cancho,Longa,Lorenzo |
:: | |
| | Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, W. T. (2002). The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298, 1569-1579.
|
| 2008 | - | The Emergence of Compositionality, Hierarchy and Recursion in Peer-to-Peer Interactions - De Beule |
:: | 2 |
| | Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, W. T. (2002). The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298, 1569-1579.
|
| 2008 | - | Language as shaped by the brain - Christiansen,Chater |
:: | 5 |
| | Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N. & Fitch, W. T. (2002) The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298:1569-79.
|
| 2008 | - | Embodiment versus memetics - Bryson |
:: | |
| | Hauser MD, Chomsky N, Fitch WT (2002a) The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298:1569
|
| 2007 | - | The consequences of talking to strangers: Evolutionary corollaries of socio-cultural influences on linguistic form - Wray,Grace |
:: | |
| | Hauser, M.D., Chomsky, N., Fitch, W.T., 2002. The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298, 1569-1579.
|
| 2007 | - | Variation, competition and selection in the self-organisation of compositionality - Vogt |
:: | |
| | Hauser, M., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, W. (2002). The Faculty of Language: What Is It, Who Has It, and How Did It Evolve? Science, 298 (5598), 1569.
|
| 2007 | - | The Role of Anticipation in the Emergence of Language - Swarup,Gasser |
:: | |
| | [9] Hauser, M.D., Chomsky, N., Fitch, W.T.: The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298 (2002) 1569-1579
|
| 2007 | - | The emergence of simple languages in an experimental coordination game - Selten,Warglien |
:: | 3 |
| | 3. Hauser MD, Chomsky N, Fitch WT (2002) Science 298:1569-1579.
|
| 2007 | - | Quantifying the evolutionary dynamics of language - Lieberman,Michel,Jackson,Tang,Nowak |
:: | 7 |
| | 7. Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N. & Fitch, W. T. The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298, 1569-1579 (2002).
|
| 2007 | - | The Evolution of Human Speech: Its Anatomical and Neural Bases - Lieberman |
:: | 1 |
| | HAUSER, M. D., N. CHOMSKY AND W. T. FITCH. 2002. The faculty of language. What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science. 298:1569-1579.
|
| 2007 | - | Innateness and culture in the evolution of language - Kirby,Dowman,Griffiths |
:: | 14 |
| | 3. Hauser M, Chomsky N, Fitch WT (2002) Science 298:1569--1579.
|
| 2007 | - | The evolution of language - Kirby |
:: | 1 |
| | Hauser, M., Chomsky, N., and Fitch, W.!T. (2002). The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298:1569-1579.
|
| 2007 | - | Complex networks and human language - Ke |
:: | 1 |
| | Hauser, Marc D., Chomsky, Noam and Fitch, W. Tecumseh. 2002. The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298: 569-1579.
|
| 2007 | - | Iterated learning: Intergenerational knowledge transmission reveals inductive biases - Kalish,Griffiths,Lewandowsky |
:: | 5 |
| | Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, W. T. (2002). The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298, 1569-1579.
|
| 2007 | - | Evolution, optimization and language change: the case of Bengali verb inflections - Choudhury,Jalan,Sarkar,Basu |
:: | |
| | M. D. Hauser, N. Chomsky, and W. T. Fitch. 2002. The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298:1569-1579, 11.
|
| 2007 | - | Computational Models of Real World Phonological Change - Choudhury |
:: | |
| | Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., and Fitch, W. T. 2002. The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298, 1569-1579.
|
| 2006 | - | Selective scenarios for the emergence of natural language - Szamado,Szathmary |
:: | 1 |
| | 33. Hauser, M.D., Chomsky, N. & Fitch T.W. (2002) The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298, 1569-1579.
|
| 2006 | - | Why Human Languages Mark Perspective - Steels,Loetzsch,Bergen |
:: | 1 |
| | 1. M. D. Hauser, N. Chomsky, W. T. Fitch, Science 298, 1569 (2002).
|
| 2006 | - | Scaling laws in language evolution - Sole |
:: | |
| | 11. Hauser, Marc D., Chomsky, N., and Fitch, W. T. 2002. The faculty of language: what is it, who has it and how did it evolve? Science 298: 1569-1579.
|
| 2006 | - | Why talk? Speaking as selfish behaviour - Scott-Phillips |
:: | 1 |
| | Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N. and Fitch, W. T. (2002). The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298, 1569-1579
|
| 2006 | - | Language and Morality: Evolution, Altruism and Linguistic Moral Mechanisms - Poulshock |
:: | |
| | Hauser, M., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, T. (2002). The faculty of language: What is it, Who has it, and How did it evolve? Science, 29822, 1569-79.
|
| 2006 | - | The evolution of language as a precursor to the evolution of morality - Poulshock |
:: | |
| | Hauser, M., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, T. (2002). The faculty of language: What is it, Who has it, and How did it evolve? Science, 29822, 1569-79.
|
| 2006 | - | Evolution as a Constraint on Theories of Syntax: The Case against Minimalism - Parker |
:: | 1 |
| | HAUSER, M., N. CHOMSKY, & W. T. FITCH. 2002. The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298.1569-1579.
|
| 2006 | - | Evolving the narrow language faculty: was recursion the pivotal step? - Parker |
:: | 2 |
| | Hauser, M., Chomsky, N. & Fitch, W. T. (2002) The facult y of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298, 1569-79.
|
| 2006 | - | Language: Costs and benefits of a specialised system for social information transmission - Nettle |
:: | |
| | Hauser, M., Chomsky, N. A., & Fitch, W. T. (2002). The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298, 1569-1579.
|
| 2006 | - | Startling starlings - Marcus |
:: | |
| | 3. Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N. & Fitch, W. T. Science 298, 1569-1579 (2002).
|
| 2006 | - | Language and life history: A new perspective on the development and evolution of human language - Locke,Bogin |
:: | 3 |
| | Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, W. T. (2002). The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298, 1569-1579.
|
| 2006 | - | Evolving Distributed Representations for Language with Self-Organizing Maps - Levy,Kirby |
:: | |
| | [33] Hauser, M.D., Chomsky, N., Fitch, W.T.: The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298 (2002) 1569-1579
|
| 2006 | - | Language Origin from an Emergentist Perspective - Ke,Holland |
:: | |
| | Hauser, M. D., N. Chomsky, and W. T. Fitch. 2002. `The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?' Science 298: 1569-79.
|
| 2006 | - | Working backwards from modern language to proto-grammar - Johansson |
:: | 1 |
| | Hauser, M., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, W. T. (2002). The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve. Science 298:1565-1566.
|
| 2006 | - | Recent Developments in the Evolution of Language - Hurford |
:: | |
| | Hauser, Marc, Noam Chomsky, and Tecumseh Fitch (2002) ``The Faculty of Language: What Is It, Who Has It, and How Did It Evolve?'' Science, 298:1569-1579.
|
| 2006 | - | Minimalist foundations of language evolution: on the question of why language is the way it is - Hinzen |
:: | |
| | Hauser, M., Chomsky, N., & W. T. Fitch (2002). The Faculty of Language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298, 1569-1579.
|
| 2006 | - | An Epistemological Inquiry into the 'What is Language' Question and the 'What Did Language Evolve For' Question - Gontier |
:: | |
| | Hauser, M., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, W. (2002). The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve ? Science, 298, 1569-1580.
|
| 2006 | - | Recursive syntactic pattern learning by songbirds - Gentner,Fenn,Margoliash,Nusbaum |
:: | 5 |
| | 4. Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N. & Fitch, W. T. The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298, 1569--1579 (2002).
|
| 2006 | - | The biology and evolution of music: a comparative perspective - Fitch |
:: | |
| | Hauser, M., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, W. T. (2002). The language faculty: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?. Science 298, 1569-1579.
|
| 2006 | - | The eloquent ape: genes, brains and the evolution of language - Fisher,Marcus |
:: | |
| | 42. Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N. & Fitch, W. T. The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298, 1569ΓΆ-“1579 (2002).
|
| 2006 | - | Network topology and self-consistency in language games - Corominas,Sole |
:: | 1 |
| | Hauser, M.D., Chomsky, N., Fitch, W.T., 2002. The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?. Science 298, 1569--1579.
|
| 2006 | - | Multi-Agent Simulation of Emergence of Schwa Deletion Pattern in Hindi - Choudhury,Basu,Sarkar |
:: | 2 |
| | HAUSER, M. D., CHOMSKY, N., and FITCH, W. T. (2002) "The Faculty of Language: What Is It, Who Has It, and How Did It Evolve?" Science, 298:1569 -1579.
|
| 2006 | - | Semantic combinations in primate calls - Arnold,Zuberbuhler |
:: | 2 |
| | 1. Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N. & Fitch, W. T. Science 298, 1569-1579 (2002).
|
| 2005 | - | The Major Transitions in the Evolution of Language - Zuidema |
:: | 2 |
| | HAUSER, M. D., CHOMSKY, N. & FITCH, W. T. (2002). The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298, 1569--1579.
|
| 2005 | - | Language Networks: their structure, function and evolution - Sole,Corominas,Valverde,Steels |
:: | 2 |
| | [1] Hauser, M.D., Chomsky, N. and Fitch, W.T. (2002). The faculty of language: what is it, who has it,and how did it evolve? Science 298, 1569-1579.
|
| 2005 | - | Why talk: an Adaptationist Approach - Scott-Phillips |
:: | |
| | Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N. and Fitch, W. T., 2002, The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?, Science 298, p.1569-1579
|
| 2005 | - | Conceptual complexity and the brain: understanding language origins - Schoenemann |
:: | |
| | Hauser, Marc D., Chomsky, Noam and Fitch, W. Tecumseh. 2002. The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did It evolve? Science, 298.1569-79.
|
| 2005 | - | Acquisition and evolution of quasi-regular languages: two puzzles for the price of one - Roberts,Onnis,Chater |
:: | 1 |
| | Hauser, M., Chomsky, N., Fitch, W.T. (2002) The faculty of language: What is it, Who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298 (22), 1569-1579.
|
| 2005 | - | The Faculty of Language: What's Special about it? - Pinker,Jackendoff |
:: | 25 |
| | Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, W. T. (2002). The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298, 1569-1579.
|
| 2005 | - | Using mathematical models of language experimentally - O'Donnell,Hauser,Fitch |
:: | |
| | 4 Hauser, M. et al. (2002) The Language faculty: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298, 1569--1579
|
| 2005 | - | Grammar Structure and the Dynamics of Language Evolution - Lee,Collier,Kobele,Stabler,Taylor |
:: | |
| | 9. M. D. Hauser, N. Chomsky, and W. T. Fitch. The faculty of language: what it is, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298:1569--1579, 2002.
|
| 2005 | - | The nature of the language faculty and its implications for evolution of language (Reply to Fitch, Hauser, and Chomsky) - Jackendoff,Pinker |
:: | 5 |
| | Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N, & Fitch, W. T. (2002) The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how does it evolve? Science 298, 1569-1579.
|
| 2005 | - | The evolution of the language faculty: Clarifications and implications - Fitch,Hauser,Chomsky |
:: | 12 |
| | Hauser, M., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, W. T. (2002). The Language Faculty: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298, 1569-1579.
|
| 2005 | - | The Evolution of Language: A Comparative Review - Fitch |
:: | 2 |
| | Hauser, M., Chomsky, N., Fitch, W.T. (2002a) "The language faculty: what is itwho has itand how did it evolve?" Science 298: 1569-1579
|
| 2005 | - | The consequences of Zipf's law for syntax and symbolic reference - Ferrer-i-Cancho,Riordan,Bollobas |
:: | 6 |
| | Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N. & Fitch, W. T. 2002 The faculty of language: what is it, who has it and how did it evolve? Science 298, 1569-1579.
|
| 2005 | - | Iterated Learning: The Exemplar-based Learning Approach - Eddy |
:: | |
| | Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N. and Fitch, W. T. (2002). The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298:1569-1579.
|
| 2005 | - | The origins of syntax: from navigation to language - Bartlett,Kazakov |
:: | |
| | M.D. Hauser, N. Chomsky and W.T. Fitch, "The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?", Science, 298, pp. 1569-1579, 2002.
|
| 2005 | - | From monkey-like action recognition to human language: An evolutionary framework for neurolinguistics - Arbib |
:: | 19 |
| | Hauser M.D., Chomsky, N., Fitch, W.T. (2002) The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science. 298:1569-79.
|
| 2004 | - | Children Creating Core Properties of Language: Evidence from an Emerging Sign Language in Nicaragua - Senghas,Kita,Ozyurek |
:: | 12 |
| | 4. M. D. Hauser, N. Chomsky, W. T. Fitch, Science 298, 1569 (2002).
|
| 2004 | - | Song Grammars as Complex Sexual Displays - Sasahara,Ikegami |
:: | 3 |
| | Hauser, M., Chomsky, N., and Fitch, W. (2002). The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298:1569--1589.
|
| 2004 | - | The immune syntax: the evolution of the language virus - Piatelli-Palmarini,Uriagereka |
:: | 2 |
| | Hauser, M. D., N. Chomsky and W. T. Fitch (2002). The faculty of language: What it is, who has it, and how did it evolve?, Science, 298, 1569-1579.
|
| 2004 | - | Early language acquisition: cracking the speech code - Kuhl |
:: | 2 |
| | 149. Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N. & Fitch, W. T. The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298, 1569-1579 (2002).
|
| 2004 | - | Self-organization and Language Evolution: System, Population and Individual - Ke |
:: | 4 |
| | Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., and Fitch, W. T. (2002b). The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298:1569.1579.
|
| 2004 | - | Human uniqueness, learned symbols and recursive thought - Hurford |
:: | 1 |
| | Hauser, Marc, Noam Chomsky, and Tecumseh Fitch, 2002, ``The Faculty of Language: What Is It, Who Has it, and How Did It Evolve?'', Science, 298:1569-1579.
|
| 2004 | - | Patterns in syntactic dependency networks - Ferrer-i-Cancho,Sole |
:: | 12 |
| | M. D. Hauser, N. Chomsky, and W. T. Fitch, Science 298, 1569 (2002).
|
| 2004 | - | The Euclidean distance between syntactically linked words - Ferrer-i-Cancho |
:: | 3 |
| | [7] M. D. Hauser, N. Chomsky, and W. T. Fitch, Science 298, 1569 (2002).
|
| 2003 | - | Modeling Language Acquisition, Change and Variation - Zuidema |
:: | 2 |
| | HAUSER, M., CHOMSKY, N. & FITCH, W. (2002). The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298, 1569-1579.
|
| 2003 | - | The Transmission of Language: models of biological and cultural evolution - Smith |
:: | 15 |
| | ----, N. CHOMSKY, & W. T. FITCH. 2002. The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve. Science 298.1569-1579.
|
| 2003 | - | Coevolution of Birdsong Grammar without Imitation - Sasahara,Ikegami |
:: | 2 |
| | 4. Hauser, M.D., Chomsky, N. and Fitch, W.T.(2002), Science, 298, pp.1569-1579.
|
| 2003 | - | A Mathematical Model of Human Languages: The Interaction of Game Dynamics and Learning Processes - Mitchener |
:: | 2 |
| | [28] M. D. Hauser, N. Chomsky, and W. T. Fitch. The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298(5598):1569-1579, 2002.
|
| 2003 | - | The evolution of the music faculty: a comparative perspective - Hauser,McDermott |
:: | 2 |
| | 17. Hauser, M.D., Chomsky, N. & Fitch, W.T. The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298, 1569-1579 (2002).
|
| 2003 | - | Constructions: a new theoretical approach to language - Goldberg |
:: | 9 |
| | 58 Hauser, M.D. et al. (2002) The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298, 1569 -1579
|
| 2003 | - | Universality in syntactic dependencies - Ferrer-i-Cancho,Sole,Kohler |
:: | |
| | [18] M. D. Hauser, N. Chomsky, and W. T. Fitch, Science 298, 1569 (2002).
|
| 2003 | - | Language Evolution: Consensus and Controversies - Christiansen,Kirby |
:: | 14 |
| | 5 Hauser, M.D. et al. (2002) The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298, 1569 -1579
|
| 2003 | - | Simplicity as a Driving Force in Linguistic Evolution - Brighton |
:: | 10 |
| | --------, Noam Chomsky, & W. Tecumseh Fitch. 2002. The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298.1569-1579.
|