| 2008 | - | Analogy and Multi-Level Selection in the Formation of a Case Grammar. A Case Study in Fluid Construction Grammar - van Trijp |
:: | |
| | FITCH, W., HAUSER, M. & CHOMSKY, N. (2005). The evolution of the language faculty: Clarifications and implications. Cognition, 97, 179-210. 31
|
| 2008 | - | Long-Distance Dependencies are not Uniquely Human - Ferrer-i-Cancho,Longa,Lorenzo |
:: | |
| | Fitch, W. T., Hauser, M. D., & Chomsky, N. (2005). The evolution of language: clarifications and implications. Cognition, 97, 179-210.
|
| 2007 | - | The evolution of language - Kirby |
:: | 1 |
| | Fitch, W.!T., Hauser, M., and Chomsky, N. (2005). The evolution of the language faculty: Clarications and implications. Cognition, 97(2):179-210.
|
| 2006 | - | Evolving the narrow language faculty: was recursion the pivotal step? - Parker |
:: | 2 |
| | Fitch, W. T., Hauser, M. & Chomsky, N. (2005) The evolution of the langua ge faculty: clarifications and implications. Cognition, 97(2), 179-210.
|
| 2006 | - | Evolution as a Constraint on Theories of Syntax: The Case against Minimalism - Parker |
:: | 1 |
| | ----, M. HAUSER, & N. CHOMSKY. 2005. The evolution of the language faculty: Clarifications and implications. Cognition 97.179-210.
|
| 2006 | - | Language and life history: A new perspective on the development and evolution of human language - Locke,Bogin |
:: | 3 |
| | Fitch, W. T., Hauser, M. D., & Chomsky, N. (in press). The evolution of the language faculty: clarifications and implications. Cognition.
|
| 2006 | - | An Epistemological Inquiry into the 'What is Language' Question and the 'What Did Language Evolve For' Question - Gontier |
:: | |
| | Fitch, W. T., Hauser, M.D., Chomsky, N. (2005). The evolution of the language faculty: clarifications and implications. Cognition, 79 (2), 179-210.
|
| 2006 | - | Recursive syntactic pattern learning by songbirds - Gentner,Fenn,Margoliash,Nusbaum |
:: | 5 |
| | 5. Fitch, W. T., Hauser, M. D. & Chomsky, N. The evolution of the language faculty: clarifications and implications. Cognition 97, 179--210 (2005).
|
| 2006 | - | The biology and evolution of music: a comparative perspective - Fitch |
:: | |
| | Fitch, W. T., Hauser, M. D., & Chomsky, N. (2005). The evolution of the language faculty: Clarifications and implications. Cognition, 97(2), 179-210.
|
| 2005 | - | Grammar Structure and the Dynamics of Language Evolution - Lee,Collier,Kobele,Stabler,Taylor |
:: | |
| | 6. W. T. Fitch, M. D. Hauser, and N. Chomsky. The evolution of the language faculty: Clarifications and implications. Cognition, Forthcoming, 2005.
|
| 2005 | - | The nature of the language faculty and its implications for evolution of language (Reply to Fitch, Hauser, and Chomsky) - Jackendoff,Pinker |
:: | 5 |
| | Fitch, W. T., Hauser, M. D., & Chomsky, N. (this volume) The evolution of the language faculty: clarifications and implications. Cognition
|
| 2005 | - | The Evolution of Language: A Comparative Review - Fitch |
:: | 2 |
| | Fitch W.T., Hauser M.D. and Chomsky N. The Evolution of the Language Faculty: Clarifications and Implications. Cognition. in press.
|