HOME   ::   Back to the Paper   ::   Cited by

Fitch, W. T., Hauser, M. D., and Chomsky, N. (2005) The evolution of the language faculty: Clarifications and implications. Cognition, 97(2):179--210.

Citations (only within this site)  [Sort by year]  [Sort by author]  [Sort by citations]

Ferrer-i-Cancho,Longa,Lorenzo, Long-Distance Dependencies are not Uniquely Human, 2008 ::
Fitch, The Evolution of Language: A Comparative Review, 2005 :: 2
Fitch, The biology and evolution of music: a comparative perspective, 2006 ::
Gentner,Fenn,Margoliash,Nusbaum, Recursive syntactic pattern learning by songbirds, 2006 :: 5
Gontier, An Epistemological Inquiry into the 'What is Language' Question and the 'What Did Language Evolve For' Question, 2006 ::
Jackendoff,Pinker, The nature of the language faculty and its implications for evolution of language (Reply to Fitch, Hauser, and Chomsky), 2005 :: 5
Kirby, The evolution of language, 2007 :: 1
Lee,Collier,Kobele,Stabler,Taylor, Grammar Structure and the Dynamics of Language Evolution, 2005 ::
Locke,Bogin, Language and life history: A new perspective on the development and evolution of human language, 2006 :: 3
Parker, Evolving the narrow language faculty: was recursion the pivotal step?, 2006 :: 2
Parker, Evolution as a Constraint on Theories of Syntax: The Case against Minimalism, 2006 :: 1
van Trijp, Analogy and Multi-Level Selection in the Formation of a Case Grammar. A Case Study in Fluid Construction Grammar, 2008 ::