HOME   ::   Back to the Paper   ::   Cited by

Christiansen, M. H. and Chater, N. (1999) Toward a connectionist model of recursion in human linguistic performance. Cognitive Science, 23(2):157--205.

Citations (only within this site)  [Sort by year]  [Sort by author]  [Sort by citations]

Cangelosi,Greco,Harnad, Symbol Grounding and the Symbolic Theft Hypothesis, 2002 :: 6
Cangelosi,Parisi, The processing of verbs and nouns in neural networks: Insights from Synthetic Brain Imaging, 2004 :: 6
Cernansky,Makula,Benuskova, Organization of the state space of a simple recurrent network before and after training on recursive linguistic structures, 2007 ::
Christiansen,Conway,Curtin, Multiple-cue integration in language acquisition: A connectionist model of speech segmentation and rule-like behavior, 2005 :: 1
Christiansen,Dale,Ellefson,Conway, The role of sequential learning in language evolution: Computational and experimental studies, 2002 :: 7
Christiansen,Devlin, Recursive inconsistencies are hard to learn: A connectionist perspective on universal word order correlations, 1997 :: 18
Conway,Christiansen, Sequential learning in non-human primates, 2001 :: 7
Johansson, Working backwards from modern language to proto-grammar, 2006 :: 1
Ke, Self-organization and Language Evolution: System, Population and Individual, 2004 :: 4
Parisi,Cangelosi, A Unified Simulation Scenario for Language Development, Evolution, and Historical Change, 2002 :: 4
Saffran,Hauser,Siebel,Kapfhamer,Tsao,Cushman, Grammatical pattern learning by human infants and cotton-top tamarins monkeys, 2008 ::
Tonkes,Blair,Wiles, A paradox of neural encoders and decoders, or, why don't we talk backwards?, 1998 :: 3
Tonkes, Getting the Point Across: The Effect of Recurrent Network Biases on the Evolution of a Simple Language, 1998 ::
Tonkes, On the Origins of Linguistic Structure: Computational models of the evolution of language, 2001 :: 7

 HOME   ::   Back to the Paper   ::   Cited by Comments to: junwang4 you-know-at gmail.com Last update: 2/3/09